----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63628/#review192316 -----------------------------------------------------------
I'm thinking we can actually move this to a `stout/cpp14.hpp` file. The general thought is that `stout/cpp*.hpp` files can be special places where we can deviate from stout naming scheme, for example since they are implementations of future STL components. This would reduce the confusion as to why a stout utility may not follow stout conventions, and it would also make the language upgrades simpler in the future for us since we can simply remove the entire file for a language upgrade, rather than finding/removing these components that are spread out in their STL-corresponding-ish files. - Michael Park On Nov. 22, 2017, 6:07 a.m., Dmitry Zhuk wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/63628/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 22, 2017, 6:07 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Michael Park. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6972 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6972 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This adds implementation of C++14 STL's `index_squence` > and `make_index_sequence` templates. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/utils.hpp > 82cab830817842c23056235973ec4419ee9ec8b1 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63628/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry Zhuk > >
