-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64010/#review192534
-----------------------------------------------------------



Lets split this review into 2

1) `updateSlave()` should take SlaveInfo and the allocator should use hostname 
and domain from SlaveInfo instead of storing it separately.
2) Rest of the changes in this review

- Vinod Kone


On Dec. 1, 2017, 6:31 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64010/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 1, 2017, 6:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The current `SlaveInfo` of a slave is now passed as an additional
> parameter to `updateSlave()`, to account for the possibility of
> it changing during an agent restart.
> 
> While the existing HierarchicalDRFAllocator only cares about the domain
> and hostname fields, the full SlaveInfo is passed since custom
> allocators might base their scheduling decisions on other fields, for
> example attributes.
> 
> Additionally, this also provides callers with an option to reset
> existing offer filters for a given slave id when the update is
> applied.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/allocator/allocator.hpp 
> acb9e4f6a843e64c915c43c218d8a533ca63333b 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/allocator.hpp 
> 48254b6e0974bdc16ffda04d3d271538048d3206 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 3c87dc797cf70f3aa48b1ed9f86d673d4ea2fe76 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> ab2abf868f9252154d934243521622c5cb107182 
>   src/tests/allocator.hpp fc5d9efc8dab3bd971fa8938e3f82e8291c4ab9d 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 0309074bab180be122c9b0074981e6f69c97feee 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64010/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>

Reply via email to