> On Dec. 7, 2017, 6:37 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/messages/messages.proto
> > Lines 693-701 (original), 693-701 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/diff/1/?file=1910528#file1910528line693>
> >
> >     So the idea for these fields are for agent default resources? If yes, 
> > can you please add some comments about that?

ah, i saw you removed it in a subsequent patch.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/#review193146
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 7, 2017, 5:49 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 7, 2017, 5:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The added fields will allow us to explicitly surface resource
> provider-related information in the master.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 2ab0fe8400a2de2318368d1b408b266ce647339d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64422/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to