> On Dec. 22, 2017, 7:34 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp
> > Lines 2452 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56722/diff/9/?file=1926989#file1926989line2452>
> >
> >     As we discussed offline, we should follow the semantic that if there 
> > are excluded images from the agent flag, they should have higher priority.
> 
> Zhitao Li wrote:
>     Fixed in r/64812

After reviewing r/64812, is `excluded_images` in the API very necessary? I am 
asking due to this scenario:

let say if an operator enables auto gc (with default excluded images in 
image_gc_config), and he wants to trigger GC by the operator API with another 
set of excluded images, which means that it is possible that some of the 
`excluded_images` may not persist (cleaned up by another auto-triggered GC).

I feel a little strange about that. Could we just have the `PRUNE_IMAGES` call 
for now?


- Gilbert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56722/#review194469
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 24, 2017, 11:31 a.m., Zhitao Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56722/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 24, 2017, 11:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jason Lai, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4945
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4945
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a new operator API for `PRUNE_IMAGES`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/agent/agent.proto 25af6dc64ca35126fd70dd10388bd2cea6dcbd36 
>   include/mesos/v1/agent/agent.proto 4ae9013e6fb27bdce72b4aa9fc9cbd99f79bc548 
>   src/slave/http.hpp 3cdbf988db923801e2b3d93cf60b33ad14653742 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 3e20c90fb94f0128a757745052534ef03612d849 
>   src/slave/validation.cpp b7243fc2316a69efa23285bf3394104e0d58759e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56722/diff/9/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. New unit test to trigger the new call.
> 2. Manually tested that images previous pulled but not running can be purged 
> through new operator API call while active images (running or being pulled) 
> are not affected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhitao Li
> 
>

Reply via email to