----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/#review195480 -----------------------------------------------------------
3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/which.hpp Lines 53-56 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/#comment274673> I think the reason for allowing the caller to specify the extension is to disambiguate in cases where multiple executables of the same name, but differing extension, exist. i.e. `foo.exe` and `foo.cmd`. But with how the loops below are laid out, we may end up prioritizing double-extensions. For example, suppose: ``` PATH = C:/;C:/path PATHEXT = .EXE;.CMD Directory structure: C:/ |-- foo.cmd.exe |-- path |-- foo.cmd os::which("foo.cmd") // Would return "C:/foo.cmd.exe" ``` We could either loop over extensions first (especially because files with double extensions are valid filenames, if confusing) : ``` foreach (const std::string& ext, exts) { foreach (const std::string& token, tokens) { ... } } ``` 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/which.hpp Lines 58 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/#comment274665> ``` This is how `where` works on Windows. ``` Do you mean "`which`" above? 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/which.hpp Lines 62 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/#comment274674> I wonder if we should note the non-case-sensitivity of the search somewhere... - Joseph Wu On Jan. 13, 2018, 6:01 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 13, 2018, 6:01 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Akash Gupta, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, and Joseph Wu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-8225 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8225 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Because `os::which` still lived in `posix/os.hpp`, it was refactored > into its own `os/which.hpp` (which the respective `os/posix/which.hpp` > and `os/windows/which.hpp`. Consumers of this will need additionally > include the new header, instead of just `os.hpp`. > > The differences in implementation from POSIX to Windows are: > > * Split the `PATH` on `;` not `:`. > * Also loop over `PATHEXT` because executables on Windows end with one > of a set of extensions. > * Removed the permissions check because it is not applicable on > Windows (instead, an executable ends with an extension in `PATHEXT`, > see above). > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am e5f11048af4ced8e8312d5c77fc3dde94f8e7012 > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/which.hpp PRE-CREATION > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/which.hpp PRE-CREATION > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/which.hpp PRE-CREATION > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp > 7427bd792368fbacafb23593dfb9213618fdcddf > 3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp de4107718cfa45f3275693a7dd59b2f52b0ced7d > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65144/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > This looks bigger than it is because the implementation was moved > (cut/paste/clang-format) out of `posix/os.hpp` into `os/posix/which.hpp`, > next patch adds header to all files using `os::which`. > > > Thanks, > > Andrew Schwartzmeyer > >
