----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/#review196571 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/fault-domains.md Lines 74 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/#comment276267> This example actually differs from the description in the first section, but it seems to me that placing all masters in the same data center somewhat defeats the goal of achieving high availability, and that most people would prefer running jobs in a remote data center rather than having the "main" datacenter overloaded. But maybe someone with more insight into the design of fault domains can comment on this? - Benno Evers On Jan. 31, 2018, 5:50 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 31, 2018, 5:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-8483 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8483 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Fault domains are a new feature in 1.5 which did not yet have > a corresponding description in the documentation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/configuration/master-and-agent.md > f247498ead43a16bbef5afb49d453073dd9ab6ef > docs/fault-domains.md PRE-CREATION > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65437/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > No. > > > Thanks, > > Benno Evers > >
