----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/#review196990 -----------------------------------------------------------
support/post-reviews.py Lines 202 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/#comment277033> I'm tempted to make this fatal, since I cannot imagine a good reason why anyone would want to still post the review, but I wanted to ask for other opinions first. - Benno Evers On Feb. 7, 2018, 2:33 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 7, 2018, 2:33 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Armand Grillet and Benjamin Bannier. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The new check warns developers if the specified tracking > branch is not fast-forwardable to HEAD. The most likely > cause of this condition is pulling a new version of the `master` > branch and forgetting to rebase the review before calling > the `post-reviews.py` script. > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/post-reviews.py 94b43253f25044a79009010e92363d1536c74299 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Benno Evers > >
