> On Feb. 7, 2018, 2:35 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > support/post-reviews.py > > Lines 202 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/diff/1/?file=1953931#file1953931line202> > > > > I'm tempted to make this fatal, since I cannot imagine a good reason > > why anyone would want to still post the review, but I wanted to ask for > > other opinions first.
After discussion with @bbannier, changed the behaviour to warn about the issue and attempt to do the right thing afterwards. - Benno ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/#review196990 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 7, 2018, 3:22 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 7, 2018, 3:22 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Armand Grillet and Benjamin Bannier. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > When posting a review originally created from a branch B, it could happen > that the resulting review included garbage changes if B was updated between > revisions. (i.e., pulling new master changes) > > This review changes the logic of the `post-reviews.py` script to only include > the changes between `HEAD` and the merge base of the tracking branch into the > review. > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/post-reviews.py 94b43253f25044a79009010e92363d1536c74299 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65545/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Benno Evers > >