> On Feb. 12, 2018, 7:57 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > src/launcher/default_executor.cpp
> > Line 1479 (original), 1492 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65551/diff/4/?file=1955928#file1955928line1509>
> >
> >     This booleans seems like a remnant of the time when the default 
> > executor would only launch a single task group.  The value is initialized 
> > to false, and is flipped to true upon launching the first TaskGroup.
> >     
> >     It is `CHECK`'d in `__launchGroup(...)` (seems redundant, as that is a 
> > continuation of `launchGroup` where `launched = true;` is set); in `wait()` 
> > (similarly redundant, but has more entrypoints); and in `shutdown()`.
> >     
> >     You can consider removing the bool in a separate patch.

I made the same comment in the previous review :)


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65551/#review197298
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 10, 2018, 6:35 a.m., Gaston Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65551/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2018, 6:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Greg Mann, Qian Zhang, and Vinod 
> Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8468
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8468
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The default executor would be completely shutdown on a
> `LAUNCH_NESTED_CONTAINER` failure.
> 
> This patch makes it kill the affected task group instead of shutting
> down and killing all task groups.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/default_executor.cpp 4a619859095cc2d30f4806813f64a2e48c83b3ea 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65551/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `sudo make check` on GNU/Linux
> 
> Regression test on https://reviews.apache.org/r/65552/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaston Kleiman
> 
>

Reply via email to