-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64226/#review198231
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




LGTM


src/linux/ns.cpp
Lines 158 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64226/#comment278342>

    nits: we don't use `&` for primitive types, `const int n`.


- Jie Yu


On Dec. 1, 2017, 11:46 p.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64226/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 1, 2017, 11:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8284
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8284
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a `ns::supported` convenience API which directly expresses the
> intent to probe whether a specific Linux namespace is supported on
> the running kernel and takes care of kernel versioning special cases.
> 
> This API subsumes the previous usages of `ns::namespaces`, so that API
> is now used only retained as an internal helper.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/ns.hpp e24d79a41eefcade343b2825b5a758d7d30a5f91 
>   src/linux/ns.cpp 5e2df1ed56432c6c1bfa04a31dba7f9f547d6139 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/ipc.cpp 
> 2d89d598d24e3bcf01d652ce3f586c9e3ccfc20b 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/pid.cpp 
> 4f8253b58018581e022eb1832b9b07703cbd318d 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp 
> d60052e9e1ccdfaaac6c0db6acfdae325cea6a9e 
>   src/tests/containerizer/ns_tests.cpp 
> 61adf8525b1df1a70d7fd9c747d2106630a7627d 
>   src/tests/containerizer/setns_test_helper.cpp 
> 045caf684baf6e724fa5f99b6cc3feeb87817ba3 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64226/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Fedora 27)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to