-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65995/#review201624
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp
Lines 2573-2574 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65995/#comment283013>

    I feel this leads to slightly involved state transitions below (e.g., 
requiring explicit clock manipulations to restore sane state).
    
    How about introducing a
    
        auto isNotRaw = [isRaw](const Resource& r) { return !isRaw(r); };
    
    and then making dedicated declines,
    
        EXPECT_CALL(sched, resourceOffers(&driver, OffersHaveAnyResource(
            std::bind(isNotRaw, lambda::_1))))
          .WillRepeatedly(DeclineOffers());
          
    We should be able to remove the new clock manipulations then.



src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp
Lines 2737-2738 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65995/#comment283014>

    Ditto.


- Benjamin Bannier


On April 12, 2018, 5:31 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65995/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 12, 2018, 5:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gaston Kleiman, Greg Mann, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8492
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8492
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The two SLRP tests assume that SLRP will send out a RAW resource in its
> first `UPDATE_STATE` message, and expect that the test framework would
> receive an offer containing the RAW resource in its first offer. However
> this behavior is not guaranteed and should not be relied on. This patch
> makes the tests decline unwanted offers by default so they no longer
> rely on SLRP's internal behavior.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/storage_local_resource_provider_tests.cpp 
> 2872f1aec1a7b94fc302a533f5ae9e1be9658087 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65995/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> Ran the two tests in repitition.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to