> On May 21, 2018, 1:21 p.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> > Can you please explain how the container will be cleaned up from the 
> > `containers_` map after agent recovery?
> 
> Andrei Budnik wrote:
>     In the current implementation, a recovered container can be cleaned up 
> only when someone calls `destroy()`. I didn't change that behaviour.
> 
> Qian Zhang wrote:
>     So if no one calls `destroy()` on a recovered container (e.g., it just 
> terminates itself), the container will never be cleaned up from the 
> `containers_` map which seems a memory leak. I know you did not change that 
> behaviour, but I think it is a tech debt which we need to fix.

Fixed.


- Andrei


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66668/#review203490
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 17, 2018, 3:23 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66668/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 17, 2018, 3:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Greg Mann, Jie Yu, and Qian 
> Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8712
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8712
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, we stored `destroyed` promise for each container and used
> it to guarantee that `destroy()` returns a non-empty value when the
> destroy-in-progress stops an launch-in-progress using the next
> containerizer. Since `wait()` and `destroy()` return the same
> `ContainerTermination` value when called with the same ContainerID
> argument, we can remove `destroyed` promise and add callbacks to
> clean up `containers_` map instead.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp 
> 1fb79f53b48154ecbd3b0165b6a8002c871e6dce 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66668/diff/8/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> internal CI
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>

Reply via email to