-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68354/#review208576
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/authentication_tests.cpp
Lines 422 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68354/#comment292636>

    Nit: I am not a big fan of hard-coded magic numbers, so I'd declare 
`expected` as:
    
    ```
      const std::vector<std::pair<Duration, Duration>> expectedLimits = {
        {Seconds(5), Seconds(7)},
        {Seconds(5), Seconds(9)},
        {Seconds(5), Seconds(13)},
        {Seconds(5), Seconds(21)},
        {Seconds(5), Seconds(37)},
        {Seconds(5), Minutes(1)},
        {Seconds(5), Minutes(1)}
      };
    ```
    
    And then change the loop to:
    
    ```
      for (auto it = expectedLimits.begin(); it != expectedLimits.end(); ++it) {
    ```
    
    But I don't expect we to add more items to `expected`, so feel free to drop 
this issue if you prefer your current version.


- Gastón Kleiman


On Aug. 16, 2018, 4:54 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68354/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 16, 2018, 4:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This test verifies that the agent backs-off properly when
> retrying authentication according to the configured parameters.
> 
> Also mocked `Slave::authenticate()` for this test.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 0420109ac93e1249906c52437e5859c5ee033fb6 
>   src/tests/authentication_tests.cpp f7a2cf17cf6154c9c67e405661bba57cf1254845 
>   src/tests/mock_slave.hpp 9a74bf35d2cab0a72ba6376392239d8080a49304 
>   src/tests/mock_slave.cpp 94a5b0d20475f49dde99108a009682b520175aa4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68354/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Added test continuously running without failure.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>

Reply via email to