> On Sept. 19, 2018, 2:43 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> > src/resource_provider/local.hpp
> > Lines 47 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68756/diff/1/?file=2090226#file2090226line47>
> >
> >     This should be defined in `resource_provider/validation.hpp`, not here. 
> > Implementation in `resource_provider/validation.cpp`.
> >     
> >     I do understand why this is done here and it's good to have a single 
> > code path to dispatch from a resource provider type to its implementation. 
> > It would be great if we could separate this from the abstract factory that 
> > `LocalResourceProvider` provides instead of dispatching to static 
> > functions. But implementing a proper solution for this would add a lot of 
> > complexity (e.g. have the abstract factory create an instance of a factory 
> > that can create `LocalResourceProvider` implementation but also validate 
> > infos and probably do more in the future), so I'm okay with using static 
> > dispatch here. Though we should think of this again if there will be more 
> > disparch functions like this in the future.

I believe there is value in keeping it here. This is not really like the 
validation functions we usually put into `validation.hpp` header files -- this 
here is a validation of a generic `ResourceProviderInfo` proto container in the 
context of a concrete `Provider` making use of it, not a validation of a proto 
container itself.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68756/#review208759
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 19, 2018, 8:36 p.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68756/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 19, 2018, 8:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Jie Yu, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9228
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9228
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Each type of RP might have some specific validations for RP info. For
> example, SLRP requires the `storage` field to be set. This patch makes
> the local RP daemon to perform such validations when adding/updating
> configs, so the `ADD_RESOURCE_PROVIDER_CONFIG` and
> `UPDATE_RESOURCE_PROVIDER_CONFIG` calls can fail fast.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/resource_provider/daemon.cpp 0a76cc6d1d34413674d1af1aa514679a4d2b7b55 
>   src/resource_provider/local.hpp 20bcc78d3fe847e03526fa59116bdbac92ec1e29 
>   src/resource_provider/local.cpp 801e6c430ed91315d87f8a45b8f3ed128beca4fc 
>   src/resource_provider/storage/provider.hpp 
> 5a371b19289c6e39fedd4cda65fa8be432d095e6 
>   src/resource_provider/storage/provider.cpp 
> 6475f653263337c381b6080695d09c49e5ea8fcf 
>   src/slave/http.cpp f8199af50cf0b43bbbb8c29afe751fcd8949d7e8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68756/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> New tests added later in the chain.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to