-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68640/#review208930
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- James Peach


On Sept. 22, 2018, 7:53 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68640/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 22, 2018, 7:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Chun-Hung Hsiao, and James Peach.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7076
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7076
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Bundles libevent 2.0.22 to ensure functional SSL builds accross all
> supported platforms. Namely macOS and Ubuntu have shown problems when
> using more recent libevent versions. The underlying problem has been
> under investigation for a longer period of time - so far without a
> solution. The bundled libevent includes a patch to make it libssl
> version > 1.0.x compatible. That patch has been extracted from the
> Fedora source package libevent-2.0.22-6.fc27. The resulting libevent
> builds against both, libssl 1.0.x as well as libssl 1.1.x.
> For unbundled builds a version detection of known problematic
> distributions vs. provided libevent is included.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/Makefile.am a6709ff9c7ef81896174ed4d35e1b1da9bb33757 
>   3rdparty/libevent-2.0.22-stable.patch PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libevent-2.0.22-stable.tar.gz PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/versions.am 8fd8bd4d7482af5304ab0b56270e49f447e0b3f5 
>   configure.ac 472e1102bf049e62beaacc9ccb231b6cf11c5fe5 
>   m4/libevent.m4 PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68640/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing on macOS 10.14 as well as Ubuntu 18.04LTS. CMake updates will 
> follow soon.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to