----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/#review210294 -----------------------------------------------------------
Hm.. why is this one not just extending the one you added in the previous review? - Benjamin Mahler On Oct. 22, 2018, 10:39 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 22, 2018, 10:39 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6630 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6630 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This benchmark evaluates the performance difference between nonquota > and quota settings. In both settings, the same allocations are made > for fair comparison. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_benchmarks.cpp > bf9167b63747f7b8a402d950947028436307082a > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Result from optimized build on a multicore 2.2GHz machine: > > Benchmark setup: 20 agents, 10 roles, 20 frameworks > Made 20 allocations in 3.508676ms for nonquota roles > Made 20 allocations in 7.901269ms for quota roles > > Benchmark setup: 200 agents, 100 roles, 200 frameworks > Made 200 allocations in 63.407391ms for nonquota roles > Made 200 allocations in 279.002319ms for quota roles > > Benchmark setup: 2000 agents, 1000 roles, 2000 frameworks > Made 2000 allocations in 4.003802373secs for nonquota roles > Made 2000 allocations in 20.503188535secs for quota roles > > > Thanks, > > Meng Zhu > >
