-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69409/#review210709
-----------------------------------------------------------



FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 67844.

Failed command: `python.exe .\support\apply-reviews.py -n -r 67844`

All the build artifacts available at: 
http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2628/mesos-review-69409

Relevant logs:

- 
[apply-review-67844.log](http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2628/mesos-review-69409/logs/apply-review-67844.log):

```
error: missing binary patch data for '3rdparty/libseccomp-2.3.3.tar.gz'
error: binary patch does not apply to '3rdparty/libseccomp-2.3.3.tar.gz'
error: 3rdparty/libseccomp-2.3.3.tar.gz: patch does not apply
```

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Nov. 20, 2018, 12:21 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69409/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 20, 2018, 12:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, James Peach, and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9392
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9392
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added Seccomp parser tests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 2d9c81b149a5764dc82593bef102f5568847daa2 
>   src/tests/CMakeLists.txt 553516ad66cab4480b7211950fc726b7d9a3869b 
>   src/tests/containerizer/linux_seccomp_parser_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/environment.cpp 03f8f5971b1e91e62ecfbf965028e6f2388d2a7b 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69409/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./src/mesos-tests 
> --gtest_filter=SeccompParserTest.SECCOMP_ParseInvalidSeccompProfile 
> --gtest_break_on_failure --gtest_repeat=100 --verbose
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>

Reply via email to