-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/#review211353
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.cpp
Line 4758 (original), 4758 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/#comment296355>

    I don't see how this is an improvement over using `std::deque`. We still 
need to iterate over these elements and IMO using a queue for this is a good 
fit.



src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5513-5519 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/#comment296356>

    To keep the flow of checking for `error.isSome()`, let's not set `reason` 
in the block above but instead do it here and have:
    ```
    if (error.isSome()) {
      reason = TaskStatus::REASON_TASK_GROUP_UNAUTHORIZED;
    } else {
      error = validation::task::group::validate(
          taskGroup, executor, framework, slave, _offeredResources);
          
      if (error.isSome()) {
        reason = TaskStatus::REASON_TASK_GROUP_INVALID;
      }
    }
    ```


- Jan Schlicht


On Dec. 17, 2018, 7:29 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 17, 2018, 7:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Greg Mann, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9480
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9480
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch fixes a bug where the master does not complete the processing
> of authorization results for `LAUNCH_GROUP`, causing a subsequent
> operation to drop if one of the remaining authorization is denied.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 3de0fd35cc815f4b5787ee2cb5e81f5059d7a47c 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to