> On Dec. 17, 2018, 11:53 a.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp
> > Line 4758 (original), 4758 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/diff/1/?file=2114313#file2114313line4758>
> >
> >     I don't see how this is an improvement over using `std::deque`. We 
> > still need to iterate over these elements and IMO using a queue for this is 
> > a good fit.

IMO using an iterator is a better fit to iterate through more than one 
iterables at the same time. Besides, this would make sure that `authorizations` 
is never modified. Unnecessary modifying a container when iterating through it 
sounds harder to maintain to me, and introducing an uncenessary container just 
feels redundant.

Also, even with the current code, we still need to add 
`CHECK(!authorizations.empty())` everywhere.

That said, since both of you and Benjamin have raised the same opinion, I'll 
keep the changes minimal and revert it back to use `std::deque`.


- Chun-Hung


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/#review211353
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 17, 2018, 6:29 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 17, 2018, 6:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Greg Mann, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9480
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9480
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch fixes a bug where the master does not complete the processing
> of authorization results for `LAUNCH_GROUP`, causing a subsequent
> operation to drop if one of the remaining authorization is denied.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 3de0fd35cc815f4b5787ee2cb5e81f5059d7a47c 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69571/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chun-Hung Hsiao
> 
>

Reply via email to