-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69818/#review212488
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/framework.cpp
Lines 504 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69818/#comment298248>

    Can you guard this with a has check?
    
    As it stands it will produce a different message if newInfo has it unset 
(info will have it set vs newInfo has it not set)


- Benjamin Mahler


On Jan. 31, 2019, 3:29 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69818/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 31, 2019, 3:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Meng Zhu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9523
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9523
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a new field to `FrameworkInfo` which can be used by
> frameworks to configure static, per-role resource requirements. We
> currently support specifying minimal allocatable resources which can
> e.g., be interpreted by allocators to filter out resources not relevant
> to frameworks, or make allocations below globally configured minimal
> allocatable resources for particular frameworks.
> 
> We use a new message `ResourceQuantities` to specify resource
> requirements. This class is modelled after the internal class of the
> same name, and we provide a conversion from the API to the internal
> type.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 9d5c2b53164adb44eb4a6f12a507e009bd607940 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto aef31eb5b8781182d3f42d935b12470b319027ed 
>   src/common/resource_quantities.hpp 11eb426104577bbbbb7977c2307df3e4917085cd 
>   src/common/resource_quantities.cpp 320983929cd7d14973c4b98d6ed5338de690ff5f 
>   src/master/framework.cpp 4089cf4dfc65ac4dc5a092c04f4c2022ed8a1587 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69818/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to