> On June 14, 2019, 9:59 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp
> > Lines 11785-11786 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70836/diff/1/?file=2148632#file2148632line11785>
> >
> >     Do we want to add e.g., tasks into this test later? As written it would 
> > fit better into the API tests (though they have pretty bad scope creep).
> 
> Greg Mann wrote:
>     Yea I'm not sure how this test will evolve as the master-side 
> functionality is added; it's possible that we will want to move the API 
> verification from this test into another one. I didn't put it in the API 
> tests because the AgentAPITest fixture is parametrized by content type for v1 
> API requests, and since this tests both v0 and v1 API outputs, it seemed like 
> an awkward fit?

I think it's OK to merge this test as-is for now, and update or erase as 
appropriate when the master-side code is merged.


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70836/#review215897
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 25, 2019, 8 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70836/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 25, 2019, 8 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Benno Evers, Benjamin Mahler, and 
> Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9818
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9818
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added test for DrainConfig in agent API outputs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp c2035976713abb31b3646c0d23771fa40df93271 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70836/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> `bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_filter="*DrainInfoInAPIOutputs*" 
> --gtest_repeat=-1 --gtest_break_on_failure`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to