> On Nov. 21, 2019, 6:02 p.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> > Overall looks good to me (and probably this one is more permanent than 
> > 71750-71754, as the metrcis have a simple strictire which is not likely to 
> > change, I'd guess).
> > 
> > Do you have any results of benchmarking v1::GetMetrics before/after this vs 
> > /metrics/snapshot ?
> 
> Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
>     s/strictire/structure/

Yeah this one is likely more permanent, we currently don't have a benchmark for 
GetMetrics (but we do have some for the underlying metrics library). Since the 
same principle was at play I didn't bother adding a specific benchmark for this 
call (need a setup which generates large numbers of metrics).


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71755/#review218719
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 19, 2019, 7:43 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71755/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 19, 2019, 7:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Sekretenko, Greg Mann, and Meng Zhu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10026
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10026
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This follow the same approach used in the GetAgents call;
> serializing directly to protobuf or json from the in-memory
> v0 state.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 60765c9b9d6903f6ed94fa8c614055698caad0da 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71755/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to