> On Jan. 8, 2020, 7:07 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystems/memory.cpp
> > Lines 199 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71944/diff/2/?file=2193218#file2193218line199>
> >
> >     Do we really want to do this? My concern is that this will make any 
> > non-Mesos-task processes on the node (networking and security components, 
> > for example) more likely to be OOM-killed than Mesos tasks. Perhaps we 
> > should only set the OOM score adjustment for burstable tasks. What do you 
> > think?

I think it depends on which one is in higher priority and more important, 
guaranteed task or non-Mesos-task processes? In Kubernetes implementation 
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.16.2/pkg/kubelet/qos/policy.go#L51:L53),
 the OOM score adjust of guaranteed container is set to -998, and kubelet's OOM 
score adjust is set to -998 too, I think we should do the same to protect 
guaranteed containers and Mesos agent, what do you think?


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71944/#review219158
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 5, 2020, 10:06 p.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71944/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 5, 2020, 10:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10048
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10048
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Set container process's OOM score adjust.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystems/memory.hpp 
> 27d88e91fb784179effd54781f84000fe85c13eb 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/subsystems/memory.cpp 
> 0896d37761a11f55ba4b866d235c3bd2b79dcfba 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71944/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to