----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/#review222025 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/gpu/isolator.cpp Lines 446-450 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/#comment311098> The reader will wonder why this was introduced? Perhaps a comment explaining that now there was an `nvidia-caps` folder introduced? Personally, I would have expected one of the following approaches: * Ignore all non-device files, or * Ignore `nvidia-caps` specifically, since we probably want to know in the future if there's some other non device stuff getting added - Benjamin Mahler On Oct. 12, 2020, 1:50 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 12, 2020, 1:50 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Kevin Klues. > > > Bugs: MESOS-10192 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10192 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Ignored directoy entries when globing Nvidia GPU devices. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/gpu/isolator.cpp > a0be1026bdaf7d4bb33f41e4c7d45666bd61f005 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > sudo make check > > > Thanks, > > Qian Zhang > >
