> On Oct. 13, 2020, 3:20 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/gpu/isolator.cpp
> > Lines 446-450 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/diff/1/?file=2240565#file2240565line446>
> >
> >     The reader will wonder why this was introduced?
> >     
> >     Perhaps a comment explaining that now there was an `nvidia-caps` folder 
> > introduced?
> >     
> >     Personally, I would have expected one of the following approaches:
> >     
> >     * Ignore all non-device files, or
> >     * Ignore `nvidia-caps` specifically, since we probably want to know in 
> > the future if there's some other non device stuff getting added

Agreed, let's ignore `nvidia-caps` specifically.


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/#review222025
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 12, 2020, 9:50 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 12, 2020, 9:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Kevin Klues.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10192
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10192
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ignored directoy entries when globing Nvidia GPU devices.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/gpu/isolator.cpp 
> a0be1026bdaf7d4bb33f41e4c7d45666bd61f005 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72945/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to