Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/207#discussion_r10869065
  
    --- Diff: 
tools/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/tools/GenerateMIMAIgnore.scala ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.tools
    +
    +import java.io.File
    +import java.util.jar.JarFile
    +
    +import scala.collection.mutable
    +import scala.collection.JavaConversions._
    +import scala.reflect.runtime.universe.runtimeMirror
    +import scala.util.Try
    +
    +/**
    + * A tool for generating classes to be excluded during binary checking 
with MIMA. It is expected
    + * that this tool is run with ./spark-class.
    + *
    + * MIMA itself only supports JVM-level visibility and doesn't account for 
package-private classes.
    + * This tool looks at all currently package-private classes and generates 
exclusions for them. Note
    + * that this approach is not sound. It can lead to false positives if we 
move or rename a previously
    + * package-private class. It can lead to false negatives if someone 
explicitly makes a class
    + * package-private that wasn't before. This exists only to help catch 
certain classes of changes
    + * which might be difficult to catch during review.
    + */
    +object GenerateMIMAIgnore {
    +  private val classLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader
    +  private val mirror = runtimeMirror(classLoader)
    +
    +  private def classesPrivateWithin(packageName: String): Set[String] = {
    +
    +    val classes = getClasses(packageName, classLoader)
    +    val privateClasses = mutable.HashSet[String]()
    +
    +    def isPackagePrivate(className: String) = {
    +     try {
    +       /* Couldn't figure out if it's possible to determine a-priori 
whether a given symbol
    +          is a module or class. */
    +
    +       val privateAsClass = mirror
    +         .staticClass(className)
    +         .privateWithin
    +         .fullName
    +         .startsWith(packageName)
    +
    +       val privateAsModule = mirror
    +         .staticModule(className)
    +         .privateWithin
    +         .fullName
    +         .startsWith(packageName)
    +
    +       privateAsClass || privateAsModule
    +     } catch {
    +        case _: Throwable => {
    +          println("Error determining visibility: " + className)
    +          false
    +        }
    +      }
    +    }
    +
    +    for (className <- classes) {
    +      val directlyPrivateSpark = isPackagePrivate(className)
    +
    +      /* Inner classes defined within a private[spark] class or object are 
effectively
    +         invisible, so we account for them as package private. */
    +      val indirectlyPrivateSpark = {
    +        val maybeOuter = className.toString.takeWhile(_ != '$')
    +        if (maybeOuter != className) {
    +          isPackagePrivate(maybeOuter)
    +        } else {
    +          false
    +        }
    +      }
    +      if (directlyPrivateSpark || indirectlyPrivateSpark) privateClasses 
+= className
    +    }
    +    privateClasses.flatMap(c => Seq(c, c.replace("$", "#"))).toSet
    +  }
    +
    +  def main(args: Array[String]) {
    +    scala.tools.nsc.io.File(".mima-excludes").
    +      writeAll(classesPrivateWithin("org.apache.spark").mkString("\n"))
    +    println("Created : .mima-excludes in current directory.")
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Get all classes in a package from a jar file.
    +   */
    +  private def getAllClasses(jarPath: String, packageName: String) = {
    +    val jar = new JarFile(new File(jarPath))
    +    val enums = 
jar.entries().map(_.getName).filter(_.startsWith(packageName))
    +    val classes = mutable.HashSet[Class[_]]()
    +    for (entry <- enums) {
    +      if (!entry.endsWith("/") && !entry.endsWith("MANIFEST.MF") && 
!entry.endsWith("properties")) {
    +        classes += Class.forName(entry.trim.replaceAll(".class", 
"").replace('/', '.'))
    +      }
    +    }
    +    classes
    +  }
    +
    +  private def shouldExclude(name: String) = {
    +    // Heuristic to remove JVM classes that do not correspond to 
user-facing classes in Scala
    +    Try(mirror.staticClass(name)).isFailure ||
    +    name.contains("anon") ||
    +    name.endsWith("class") ||
    --- End diff --
    
    The scala compiler creates some extra classes called, e.g.
    
    ```
    Error determining visibility: 
org.apache.spark.repl.SparkMemberHandlers$class
    Error determining visibility: org.apache.spark.AccumulatorParam$class
    Error determining visibility: 
org.apache.spark.streaming.receivers.Receiver$class
    Error determining visibility: 
org.apache.spark.util.random.RandomSampler$class
    ```
    
    I don't really know what those are for but they aren't user-facing so I 
think we can exclude them.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to