beliefer commented on a change in pull request #27058: [SPARK-30395][SQL] When
one or more DISTINCT aggregate expressions operate on the same field, the
DISTINCT aggregate expression allows the use of the FILTER clause
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27058#discussion_r365235877
##########
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/RewriteDistinctAggregates.scala
##########
@@ -316,6 +362,86 @@ object RewriteDistinctAggregates extends
Rule[LogicalPlan] {
}.asInstanceOf[NamedExpression]
}
Aggregate(groupByAttrs, patchedAggExpressions, firstAggregate)
+ } else if (distinctAggGroups.size == 1) {
+ val (distinctAggExpressions, regularAggExpressions) =
aggExpressions.partition(_.isDistinct)
+ if (distinctAggExpressions.exists(_.filter.isDefined)) {
+ val regularAggExprs = regularAggExpressions.filter(e =>
e.children.exists(!_.foldable))
+ val regularFunChildren = regularAggExprs
+ .flatMap(_.aggregateFunction.children.filter(!_.foldable))
+ val regularFilterAttrs = regularAggExprs.flatMap(_.filterAttributes)
+ val regularAggChildren = (regularFunChildren ++
regularFilterAttrs).distinct
+ val regularAggChildAttrMap =
regularAggChildren.map(expressionAttributePair)
+ val regularAggChildAttrLookup = regularAggChildAttrMap.toMap
+ val regularOperatorMap = regularAggExprs.map {
+ case ae @ AggregateExpression(af, _, _, filter, _) =>
+ val newChildren = af.children.map(c =>
regularAggChildAttrLookup.getOrElse(c, c))
+ val raf =
af.withNewChildren(newChildren).asInstanceOf[AggregateFunction]
+ val filterOpt = filter.map(_.transform {
+ case a: Attribute => regularAggChildAttrLookup.getOrElse(a, a)
+ })
+ val aggExpr = ae.copy(aggregateFunction = raf, filter = filterOpt)
+ (ae, aggExpr)
+ }
+ val distinctAggExprs = distinctAggExpressions.filter(e =>
e.children.exists(!_.foldable))
+ val rewriteDistinctOperatorMap = distinctAggExprs.zipWithIndex.map {
+ case (ae @ AggregateExpression(af, _, _, filter, _), i) =>
+ // Why do we need to construct the phantom id ?
+ // First, In order to reduce costs, it is better to handle the
filter clause locally.
+ // e.g. COUNT (DISTINCT a) FILTER (WHERE id > 1), evaluate
expression
+ // If(id > 1) 'a else null first, and use the result as output.
+ // Second, If more than one DISTINCT aggregate expression uses the
same column,
+ // We need to construct the phantom attributes so as the output
not lost.
+ // e.g. SUM (DISTINCT a), COUNT (DISTINCT a) FILTER (WHERE id > 1)
will output
+ // attribute 'phantom1-a and attribute 'phantom2-a instead of two
'a.
+ // Note: We just need to illusion the expression with filter
clause.
+ // The illusionary mechanism may result in multiple distinct
aggregations uses
+ // different column, so we still need to call `rewrite`.
+ val phantomId = i + 1
+ val unfoldableChildren = af.children.filter(!_.foldable)
+ val exprAttrs = unfoldableChildren.map { e =>
+ (e, AttributeReference(s"phantom$phantomId-${e.sql}",
e.dataType, nullable = true)())
Review comment:
OK. Thanks!
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
