zero323 commented on a change in pull request #27406:
[SPARK-30681][PYSPARK][SQL] Add higher order functions API to PySpark
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27406#discussion_r373187648
##########
File path: python/pyspark/sql/column.py
##########
@@ -129,6 +129,103 @@ def _(self, other):
return _
+def _unresolved_named_lambda_variable(*name_parts):
+ """
+ Create o.a.s.sql.expressions.UnresolvedNamedLambdaVariable and
+ convert it to o.s.sql.Column
+
+ :param name_parts: str
+ """
+ sc = SparkContext._active_spark_context
+ name_parts_seq = _to_seq(sc, name_parts)
+ expressions = sc._jvm.org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions
+ return Column(
+ sc._jvm.Column(
+ expressions.UnresolvedNamedLambdaVariable(name_parts_seq)
+ )
+ )
+
+
+def _get_lambda_parameters(f):
+ import inspect
+
+ signature = inspect.signature(f)
+ parameters = signature.parameters.values()
+
+ # We should exclude functions that use
+ # variable args and keyword argnames
+ # as well as keyword only args
+ supported_parmeter_types = {
+ inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD,
+ inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY,
+ }
+
+ # Validate that
+ # function arity is between 1 and 3
+ if not (1 <= len(parameters) <= 3):
Review comment:
If we decide it should we could add `expected_nargs:
Iterable[Iterable[int]]` to `_invoke_higher_order_function` and then pass it
down to `_create_lambda` to fail if it doesn't match the signature.
Or maybe change `funs` to `Iterable[Tuple[Callable, Iterable[int]]]`.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
