MaxGekk opened a new pull request #28057: [WIP][SQL] Benchmark rebasing of 
dates/timestamps 
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28057
 
 
   TL&DR
   I benchmarked save/load for Parquet:
   - Saving is **~6 times slower**
   - Loading w/ vectorized **off** is **~4 times slower**
   - Loading w/ vectorized **on** is **~11 times slower**
   
   Here is the results I got on my laptop:
   ```
   Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_231-b11 on Mac OS X 10.15.3
   Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4850HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz
   Save timestamps to parquet:               Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   
Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   after 1582, noop                                   2265           2265       
    0         44.2          22.6       1.0X
   after 1582, rebase off                            13689          13689       
    0          7.3         136.9       0.2X
   after 1582, rebase on                             71073          71073       
    0          1.4         710.7       0.0X
   before 1582, noop                                  2118           2118       
    0         47.2          21.2       1.1X
   before 1582, rebase off                           14442          14442       
    0          6.9         144.4       0.2X
   before 1582, rebase on                            78824          78824       
    0          1.3         788.2       0.0X
   
   Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_231-b11 on Mac OS X 10.15.3
   Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4850HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz
   Load timestamps from parquet:             Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   
Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   after 1582, vec off, rebase off                   12025          12326       
  390          8.3         120.2       1.0X
   after 1582, vec off, rebase on                    51214          52395       
 1724          2.0         512.1       0.2X
   after 1582, vec on, rebase off                     3798           3848       
   71         26.3          38.0       3.2X
   after 1582, vec on, rebase on                     42998          43137       
  138          2.3         430.0       0.3X
   before 1582, vec off, rebase off                  11692          11793       
  140          8.6         116.9       1.0X
   before 1582, vec off, rebase on                   52789          52973       
  173          1.9         527.9       0.2X
   before 1582, vec on, rebase off                    3832           3871       
   48         26.1          38.3       3.1X
   after 1582, vec on, rebase on                     44904          44956       
   66          2.2         449.0       0.3X
   ```
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   
   ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
   <!--
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to