Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4998#discussion_r26318113
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1706,6 +1706,43 @@
<jline.groupid>jline</jline.groupid>
</properties>
</profile>
+ <profile>
+ <id>log4j2</id>
+ <activation>
+ <property><name>log4j2</name></property>
+ </activation>
+ <properties>
+ <log4j2.version>2.1</log4j2.version>
+ </properties>
+ <dependencies>
--- End diff --
Hm. I wonder what would happen if Spark always used log4j 2.x, and then
included the 1.2 -> 2 bridge code just in case an app relies on Spark providing
1.2?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
