cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #28123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28123#discussion_r428474929



##########
File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/bucketing/CoalesceBucketsInEquiJoin.scala
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.bucketing
+
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.BucketSpec
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions._
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.ExtractEquiJoinKeys
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.{Filter, Join, LogicalPlan, 
Project, UnaryNode}
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.Rule
+import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.{HadoopFsRelation, 
LogicalRelation}
+import org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SQLConf
+
+/**
+ * Wraps `LogicalRelation` to provide the number of buckets for coalescing.
+ */
+case class CoalesceBuckets(
+    numCoalescedBuckets: Int,
+    child: LogicalRelation) extends UnaryNode {
+  require(numCoalescedBuckets > 0,
+    s"Number of coalesced buckets ($numCoalescedBuckets) must be positive.")
+
+  override def output: Seq[Attribute] = child.output
+}
+
+/**
+ * This rule adds a `CoalesceBuckets` logical plan if the following conditions 
are met:
+ *   - Two bucketed tables are joined.
+ *   - Join is the equi-join.
+ *   - The larger bucket number is divisible by the smaller bucket number.
+ *   - "spark.sql.bucketing.coalesceBucketsInJoin.enabled" is set to true.
+ *   - The difference in the number of buckets is less than the value set in
+ *     "spark.sql.bucketing.coalesceBucketsInJoin.maxNumBucketsDiff".
+ */
+object CoalesceBucketsInEquiJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan]  {
+  private def isPlanEligible(plan: LogicalPlan): Boolean = {
+    def forall(plan: LogicalPlan)(p: LogicalPlan => Boolean): Boolean = {
+      p(plan) && plan.children.forall(forall(_)(p))
+    }
+
+    forall(plan) {
+      case _: Filter | _: Project | _: LogicalRelation => true
+      case _ => false
+    }
+  }
+
+  private def getBucketSpec(plan: LogicalPlan): Option[BucketSpec] = {
+    if (isPlanEligible(plan)) {
+      plan.collectFirst {
+        case _ @ LogicalRelation(r: HadoopFsRelation, _, _, _) if 
r.bucketSpec.nonEmpty =>
+          r.bucketSpec.get
+      }
+    } else {
+      None
+    }
+  }
+
+  private def mayCoalesce(numBuckets1: Int, numBuckets2: Int, conf: SQLConf): 
Option[Int] = {
+    assert(numBuckets1 != numBuckets2)
+    val (small, large) = (math.min(numBuckets1, numBuckets2), 
math.max(numBuckets1, numBuckets2))
+    // A bucket can be coalesced only if the bigger number of buckets is 
divisible by the smaller
+    // number of buckets because bucket id is calculated by modding the total 
number of buckets.
+    if ((large % small == 0) && ((large - small) <= 
conf.coalesceBucketsInJoinMaxNumBucketsDiff)) {
+      Some(small)
+    } else {
+      None
+    }
+  }
+
+  private def addCoalesceBuckets(plan: LogicalPlan, numCoalescedBuckets: Int): 
LogicalPlan = {
+    plan.transformUp {
+      case l @ LogicalRelation(_: HadoopFsRelation, _, _, _) =>
+        CoalesceBuckets(numCoalescedBuckets, l)
+    }
+  }
+
+  object ExtractJoinWithBuckets {
+    def unapply(plan: LogicalPlan): Option[(Join, Int, Int)] = {
+      plan match {
+        case join @ ExtractEquiJoinKeys(_, _, _, _, left, right, _) =>

Review comment:
       yes




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to