Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5004#discussion_r26653462
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1156,6 +1158,28 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
/**
+ * Execute a block of code that evaluates to Unit, stop SparkContext is
there is any uncaught
+ * exception
+ *
+ * NOTE: This method is to be called by the driver-side components to
avoid stopping the
+ * user-started JVM process completely; in contrast, tryOrExit is to be
called in the
+ * spark-started JVM process .
+ */
+ def tryOrStopSparkContext(sc: SparkContext)(block: => Unit) {
+ try {
+ block
+ } catch {
+ case e: ControlThrowable => throw e
+ case t: Throwable =>
+ if (sc != null) {
+ logError(s"uncaught error in thread
${Thread.currentThread().getName}, stopping " +
+ "SparkContext", t)
+ sc.stop()
+ }
--- End diff --
Hi, @zsxwing thanks for the comments
I personally prefer a more conservative way here (the current approach)
Because the throwable thrown from here can be varying in terms of types,
and I'm concerning that the Throwable from here, like `OOM`, would be mixed
with the instances of the same type generated by the other components in user's
program; on the other hand, our goal is just to let the user know
`SparkContext` is stopped
So I prefer to letting the user call SparkContext.runJob to get a 'new
IllegalStateException("SparkContext has been shutdown")' which (hopefully) will
be handled `exactly`
@srowen @aarondav , your thoughts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]