skambha commented on pull request #27627: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27627#issuecomment-637732889
Thanks @cloud-fan and all for merge into master. Thanks for the discussion related to streaming use cases backward compatibility. I wanted to clarify my understanding of some of the recent discussion on it. >xuanyuanking said "Agree with Jungtaek about only put this into 3.0 and leave 2.4 and earlier version unchanged. "https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27627#issuecomment-637197941 Initially, it sounded like both (@xuanyuanking and @HeartSaVioR were ok with it going into v3.0 and not go into v2.4. But later we decide to not put it into v3.0. Could you point out the PR/ JIRA that we are waiting for before this can go into v3.x branch. I agree, it seems like if there is a compatibility issue, it would be best to go into a major release than a minor one. Just trying to understand: What is different in this use case than what we have in SPARK-26154 that went into v3.0 and was pointed out here. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27627#issuecomment-636823889 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
