HyukjinKwon edited a comment on pull request #27331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27331#issuecomment-649888157


   > I haven't replied because I don't see how it is an important concern.
   
   @rdblue, I explained multiple times why I think this is relevant and 
important - once you add them, you should fix it in Python and R side too. I 
don't believe all dev people are used to Python and R side given my 
interactions for many years in Spark dev.
   I support to add it for 3.1 but not now in the early stage if it's unstable. 
As I explained earlier, I take this DSv2 case as an exceptional case. See the 
concern about https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27331#discussion_r445268946 
too.
   
   This isn't a great way to discuss that you ignore because you don't think 
it's important or relevant.
   
   I just wanted to know the rough picture rather than asking you to assert the 
stability here because you are the one who drove DSv2 in the community, and I 
do believe you're the right one to ask. I fully understand the things can 
change.
   
   I am here to help and make progresses here rather than nitpicking or blaming 
on something not done. I fully understand the pain we had at DSv2. It would be 
nicer if we can be more cooperative next time.
   
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to