maropu commented on a change in pull request #28804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28804#discussion_r447512443



##########
File path: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala
##########
@@ -2196,6 +2196,13 @@ object SQLConf {
       .checkValue(bit => bit >= 10 && bit <= 30, "The bit value must be in 
[10, 30].")
       .createWithDefault(16)
 
+  val SKIP_PARTIAL_AGGREGATE_ENABLED =
+    buildConf("spark.sql.aggregate.partialaggregate.skip.enabled")
+      .internal()
+      .doc("Avoid sort/spill to disk during partial aggregation")
+      .booleanConf
+      .createWithDefault(true)

Review comment:
       >  They turn off map side aggregate (i.e., partial aggregate will be 
pass through) in Physical operator (i.e., Group-By operator) if map-side 
aggregation reduce the entries by at least half and they look at 100000 rows to 
do that 
   
   Looks whether that approach improves performance depends on IO performance, 
but looks interesting to me. WDYT? @cloud-fan 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to