aokolnychyi opened a new pull request #29066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29066


   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   This WIP PR shows how we can implement first steps of the [design 
doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X0NsQSryvNmXBY9kcvfINeYyKC-AahZarUqg3nS1GQs/edit#)
 for SPARK-23889.
   
   **Important:** the purpose of this PR is to simplify the review of the 
design doc and get early feedback on the proposal. The change is complementary 
to the design doc and is not meant for a detailed review.
   
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   Data sources should be able to request a specific distribution and ordering 
of data on write. In particular, these scenarios are considered useful:
   - global sort
   - cluster data and sort within partitions
   - local sort within partitions
   - no sort
   
   Please see the design doc above for a more detailed explanation of 
requirements.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   This PR introduces public changes to the DS V2 by adding a logical write 
abstraction as we have on the read path as well as additional interfaces to 
represent distribution and ordering of data (please see the doc for 
alternatives).
   
   Important pieces:
   - `Write` - a logical representation of a data source write
   - `RequiresDistributionAndOrdering` - a write that requires a specific 
distribution/ordering
   - `V2Writes` - a rule that constructs a logical write
   - `V2WriteRequirements` - a rule that inserts repartition/sort nodes
   - `WriteDistributionAndOrderingSuite` - a test case with samples
   
   The PR is split into 2 commits that are self-contained:
   
   - Introduction of the logical write abstraction
   - Required distribution and sort work
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   Since this PR is just an example of what can be done, the patch comes with a 
minimal test case.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to