agrawaldevesh commented on a change in pull request #29367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29367#discussion_r468223171



##########
File path: 
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/WorkerDecommissionSuite.scala
##########
@@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ class WorkerDecommissionSuite extends SparkFunSuite with 
LocalSparkContext {
     // decom.sh message passing is tested manually.
     val sched = sc.schedulerBackend.asInstanceOf[StandaloneSchedulerBackend]
     val execs = sched.getExecutorIds()
-    execs.foreach(execId => sched.decommissionExecutor(execId, 
ExecutorDecommissionInfo("", false)))
+    // Make the executors decommission, finish, exit, and not be replaced.
+    val execsAndDecomInfo = execs.map((_, ExecutorDecommissionInfo("", false)))
+    sched.decommissionExecutors(execsAndDecomInfo, adjustTargetNumExecutors = 
true)

Review comment:
       Okay sure :-) But I guess that dynamic allocation isn't even enabled for 
this test so executors shouldn't just launch again on this node -- unless a new 
worker appears (this is standalone local cluster testing) out of nowhere. Spark 
only launches executors when it detects spare capacity for that -- all that 
mesos based resourceOffers paradigm. 
   
   In any case, I understand your intent here now and I am totally cool with 
that. So please consider this resolved.

##########
File path: 
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerDecommissionIntegrationSuite.scala
##########
@@ -190,7 +190,8 @@ class BlockManagerDecommissionIntegrationSuite extends 
SparkFunSuite with LocalS
     logInfo(s"Decommissioning executor ${execToDecommission}")
     sched.decommissionExecutor(
       execToDecommission,
-      ExecutorDecommissionInfo("", isHostDecommissioned = false))
+      ExecutorDecommissionInfo("", isHostDecommissioned = false),
+      adjustTargetNumExecutors = true)

Review comment:
       This is also resolved. Reasoning sounds good -- although do you want to 
add the same comment as above: 
   
   // Decommission executor and ensure it is not relaunched by setting 
adjustTargetNumExecutors




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to