c21 commented on a change in pull request #29804: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29804#discussion_r493877941
########## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/bucketing/DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScan.scala ########## @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.bucketing + +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.{Partial, PartialMerge} +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.physical.{ClusteredDistribution, HashClusteredDistribution} +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.Rule +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.{FileSourceScanExec, FilterExec, ProjectExec, SortExec, SparkPlan} +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.BaseAggregateExec +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.Exchange +import org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SQLConf + +/** + * Disable unnecessary bucketed table scan based on actual physical query plan. + * NOTE: this rule is designed to be applied right after [[EnsureRequirements]], + * where all [[ShuffleExchangeExec]] and [[SortExec]] have been added to plan properly. + * + * When BUCKETING_ENABLED and AUTO_BUCKETED_SCAN_ENABLED are set to true, go through + * query plan to check where bucketed table scan is unnecessary, and disable bucketed table + * scan if needed. + * + * For all operators which [[hasInterestingPartition]] (i.e., require [[ClusteredDistribution]] + * or [[HashClusteredDistribution]]), check if the sub-plan for operator has [[Exchange]] and + * bucketed table scan. If yes, disable the bucketed table scan in the sub-plan. + * Only allow certain operators in sub-plan, which guarantees each sub-plan is single lineage + * (i.e., each operator has only one child). See details in + * [[disableBucketWithInterestingPartition]]). + * + * Examples: + * (1).join: + * SortMergeJoin(t1.i = t2.j) + * / \ + * Sort(i) Sort(j) + * / \ + * Shuffle(i) Scan(t2: i, j) + * / (bucketed on column j, enable bucketed scan) + * Scan(t1: i, j) + * (bucketed on column j, DISABLE bucketed scan) + * + * (2).aggregate: + * HashAggregate(i, ..., Final) + * | + * Shuffle(i) + * | + * HashAggregate(i, ..., Partial) + * | + * Filter + * | + * Scan(t1: i, j) + * (bucketed on column j, DISABLE bucketed scan) + * + * The idea of [[hasInterestingPartition]] is inspired from "interesting order" in + * the paper "Access Path Selection in a Relational Database Management System" + * (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/582095.582099). + */ +case class DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScan(conf: SQLConf) extends Rule[SparkPlan] { + + /** + * Disable bucketed table scan with pre-order traversal of plan. + * + * @param withInterestingPartition The traversed plan has operator with interesting partition. + * @param withExchange The traversed plan has [[Exchange]] operator. + */ + private def disableBucketWithInterestingPartition( + plan: SparkPlan, + withInterestingPartition: Boolean, + withExchange: Boolean): SparkPlan = { + plan match { + case p if hasInterestingPartition(p) => + // Operators with interesting partition, propagates `withInterestingPartition` as true + // to its children. + p.mapChildren(disableBucketWithInterestingPartition(_, true, false)) + case exchange: Exchange if withInterestingPartition => + // Exchange operator propagates `withExchange` as true to its child + // if the plan has interesting partition. + exchange.mapChildren(disableBucketWithInterestingPartition( + _, withInterestingPartition, true)) + case scan: FileSourceScanExec + if withInterestingPartition && withExchange && isBucketedScanWithoutFilter(scan) => + // Disable bucketed table scan if the plan has interesting partition, + // and [[Exchange]] in the plan. + scan.copy(disableBucketedScan = true) + case o => + if (isAllowedUnaryExecNode(o)) { Review comment: @cloud-fan - as discussed offline, we still need to traverse sub-plan for node with interesting partition, even though this node cannot disable bucketed scan (e.g. multiple join cases). Updated the code to disable bucketed table scan if: 1. The sub-plan from root to bucketed table scan, only contains node with interesting partition, exchange, and allowed whitelisted single-child nodes. 2. The sub-plan from root to bucketed table scan, does not contain node with interesting partition. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
