srowen commented on a change in pull request #29936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29936#discussion_r499878361
##########
File path: pom.xml
##########
@@ -3150,23 +3146,7 @@
<profile>
<id>hive-1.2</id>
- <properties>
- <hive.group>org.spark-project.hive</hive.group>
- <hive.classifier></hive.classifier>
- <!-- Version used in Maven Hive dependency -->
- <hive.version>1.2.1.spark2</hive.version>
- <!-- Version used for internal directory structure -->
- <hive.version.short>1.2</hive.version.short>
- <hive.parquet.scope>${hive.deps.scope}</hive.parquet.scope>
- <hive.storage.version>2.6.0</hive.storage.version>
- <hive.storage.scope>provided</hive.storage.scope>
- <hive.common.scope>provided</hive.common.scope>
- <hive.llap.scope>provided</hive.llap.scope>
- <hive.serde.scope>provided</hive.serde.scope>
- <hive.shims.scope>provided</hive.shims.scope>
- <orc.classifier>nohive</orc.classifier>
- <datanucleus-core.version>3.2.10</datanucleus-core.version>
- </properties>
+ <!-- Exists only for backward compatibility. No-op. -->
Review comment:
No, it's just that you get an error if you specify `-Phive-1.2` if it's
removed entirely. Now, maybe that's a good thing? previously for Scala profiles
I had left them in because, for example `-Pscala-2.12` was not the default
before. When it became the default, that would have caused an error even though
it was already set up for 2.12. But this case is probably different: someone
selecting Hive 1.x support should see an error, probably? in which case this
should be removed.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
