zhongyu09 commented on a change in pull request #31167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31167#discussion_r557003450



##########
File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/adaptive/AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala
##########
@@ -190,7 +191,36 @@ case class AdaptiveSparkPlanExec(
           executionId.foreach(onUpdatePlan(_, result.newStages.map(_.plan)))
 
           // Start materialization of all new stages and fail fast if any 
stages failed eagerly
-          result.newStages.foreach { stage =>
+
+          // SPARK-33933: we should materialize broadcast stages first and 
wait the
+          // materialization finish before materialize other stages, to avoid 
waiting
+          // for broadcast tasks to be scheduled and leading to broadcast 
timeout.
+          val broadcastMaterializationFutures = result.newStages
+            .filter(_.isInstanceOf[BroadcastQueryStageExec])
+            .map { stage =>
+            var future: Future[Any] = null

Review comment:
       I am not sure line 201~215 should have 2 more space indent. Just 
behavior same as line 225~236 (old code). 

##########
File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/adaptive/AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala
##########
@@ -190,7 +191,36 @@ case class AdaptiveSparkPlanExec(
           executionId.foreach(onUpdatePlan(_, result.newStages.map(_.plan)))
 
           // Start materialization of all new stages and fail fast if any 
stages failed eagerly
-          result.newStages.foreach { stage =>
+
+          // SPARK-33933: we should materialize broadcast stages first and 
wait the
+          // materialization finish before materialize other stages, to avoid 
waiting
+          // for broadcast tasks to be scheduled and leading to broadcast 
timeout.
+          val broadcastMaterializationFutures = result.newStages
+            .filter(_.isInstanceOf[BroadcastQueryStageExec])
+            .map { stage =>
+            var future: Future[Any] = null

Review comment:
       I am not sure line 201 ~ 215 should have 2 more space indent. Just 
behavior same as line 225~ 236 (old code). 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to