cloud-fan edited a comment on pull request #31643: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31643#issuecomment-787701759
Seems like there are two proposals: 1. regenerate the block ids when building the `FetchShuffleBlocks` request. 2. leverage the fact the block ids are ordered already. I think the goal is the same: keep block ids and the fetch request in sync. And these 2 proposals have no actual difference if the block ids are indeed ordered (you will regenerate the same ordered block ids). I don't have a strong preference here. Option 1 seems more flexible, and we can remove the assumptions specified in the doc of `createFetchShuffleBlocksMsg`. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
