dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on pull request #29642:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29642#issuecomment-840817042


   > No. Github action runs on different machines, there is a performance 
difference between them.
   
   No, @wangyum . I'm meaning the **ratio** between ORC and Parquet on the same 
machine run. Previously, ORC and Parquet shows the similar performance but now 
Parquet become slower than ORC after this PR. For example, the following.
   
   ```
   - Parquet Vectorized                                10512          10572     
     58          1.5         668.4       1.0X
   - Parquet Vectorized (Pushdown)                       596            621     
     19         26.4          37.9      17.6X
   - Native ORC Vectorized                              8555           8723     
     97          1.8         543.9       1.2X
   - Native ORC Vectorized (Pushdown)                    592            609     
     11         26.6          37.7      17.8X
   + Parquet Vectorized                                 9788          10231     
    259          1.6         622.3       1.0X
   + Parquet Vectorized (Pushdown)                       493            536     
     29         31.9          31.3      19.9X
   + Native ORC Vectorized                              6487           6575     
    137          2.4         412.4       1.5X
   + Native ORC Vectorized (Pushdown)                    436            447     
     14         36.1          27.7      22.4X
   ```
   
   Although the value is too small, this generate result shows a slowdown of 
Parquet compared with ORC. That was my questions.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to