HyukjinKwon commented on pull request #33429: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33429#issuecomment-885370523
hmm I feel like that's inconsistent with the current SparkPlan naming rules. For example, there's no `-er`s. One example might be `V2TableWriteExec`. As far as I can tell, there's almost no plan named with actors. `ScanExec`, `ProtectExec`, `ExchangeExec`, `AggregateExec`, etc. I believe using `Read` is more consistent with other namimg. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
