sumeetgajjar commented on a change in pull request #34693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34693#discussion_r755398500



##########
File path: 
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/MsSqlServerIntegrationSuite.scala
##########
@@ -356,4 +357,42 @@ class MsSqlServerIntegrationSuite extends 
DockerJDBCIntegrationSuite {
         0, 3, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, -1, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 
2, 0,
         0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3))
   }
+
+  test("withClause and query  JDBC options") {
+    val expectedResult = Set(
+      (42, "fred"),
+      (17, "dave")
+    ).map { case (x, y) =>
+      Row(Integer.valueOf(x), String.valueOf(y))
+    }
+
+    val withClause = "WITH t AS (SELECT x, y FROM tbl)"
+    val query = "SELECT * FROM t WHERE x > 10"
+    val df = spark.read.format("jdbc")
+      .option("url", jdbcUrl)
+      .option("withClause", withClause)
+      .option("query", query)
+      .load()
+    assert(df.collect.toSet === expectedResult)
+
+    df.explain(true)
+  }
+
+  test("withClause and dbtable JDBC options") {
+    val expectedResult = Set(
+      (42, "fred"),
+      (17, "dave")
+    ).map { case (x, y) =>
+      Row(Integer.valueOf(x), String.valueOf(y))
+    }
+
+    val withClause = "WITH t AS (SELECT x, y FROM tbl WHERE x > 10)"
+    val dbtable = "t"
+    val df = spark.read.format("jdbc")
+      .option("url", jdbcUrl)
+      .option("withClause", withClause)
+      .option("dbtable", dbtable)
+      .load()
+    assert(df.collect.toSet === expectedResult)
+  }

Review comment:
       Since it already works with temp table syntax, should we also add the 
corresponding UTs?

##########
File path: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
##########
@@ -325,6 +325,6 @@ private[sql] case class JDBCRelation(
   override def toString: String = {
     val partitioningInfo = if (parts.nonEmpty) s" 
[numPartitions=${parts.length}]" else ""
     // credentials should not be included in the plan output, table 
information is sufficient.
-    s"JDBCRelation(${jdbcOptions.tableOrQuery})" + partitioningInfo
+    s"JDBCRelation(${jdbcOptions.withClause}${jdbcOptions.tableOrQuery})" + 
partitioningInfo

Review comment:
       Since `partitioningInfo` is also a string, should we create the final 
string as 
   
`s"JDBCRelation(${jdbcOptions.withClause}${jdbcOptions.tableOrQuery})$partitioningInfo"`?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to