khalidmammadov commented on pull request #35323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35323#issuecomment-1028423639


   > Thank you for making a PR, but I'd not care about the existing test cases. 
Technically, in the following your proposal, the previous column name 
`partCol1` sounds better than the newly proposed `a` because `partCol1` has a 
meaning `partition column` clearly.
   > 
   > ```scala
   > - val partition = CatalogTablePartition(Map("partCol1" -> "1", "partCol2" 
-> "2"), storageFormat)
   > + val partition = CatalogTablePartition(Map("a" -> "1", "b" -> "2"), 
storageFormat)
   > ```
   
   These were renamed as I have started using utility function that provides 
these partitions with these simple names. I can rename it in that function and 
throughout the suite if needed but I if you are saying these type of 
improvements are not necessary then I can close this and sister PR 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35293. @dongjoon-hyun Please confirm


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to