gengliangwang opened a new pull request, #37160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37160

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'core/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   Currently, casting decimal as string type will result in Strings with 
exponential notations if the adjusted exponent is less than -6. This is 
consistent with BigDecimal.toString 
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/math/BigDecimal.html#toString 
   
   After this PR, the casting always uses plain string representation.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   1. The current behavior doesn't compliant to the ANSI SQL standard.
   <img width="918" alt="image" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/178395756-baecbe90-7a5f-4b4c-b63c-9f1fdf656107.png";>
   <img width="603" alt="image" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1097932/178395567-fa5b6877-ff08-48b5-b715-243c954d6bbc.png";>
   
   2. It is different from databases like PostgreSQL/Oracle/MS SQL server/etc..
   3. The current behavior may surprise users since it only happens when the 
adjusted exponent is less than -6. The following query will return `false` by 
default (when ANSI SQL mode is off) since the `0.0000000123` is converted as 
`1.23E-8`:
   ```sql
   select '0.0000000123' in (0.0000000123, '0.123');
   ```
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   Yes, after changes, Spark SQL always uses plain string representation on 
casting Decimal to String. To restore the legacy behavior, which uses 
scientific notation if the adjusted exponent is less than -6, set 
`spark.sql.legacy.castDecimalToString.enabled` to `true`.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   Unit test


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to