itholic commented on code in PR #38447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38447#discussion_r1012485332
##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/errors/QueryParsingErrors.scala:
##########
@@ -608,8 +608,12 @@ private[sql] object QueryParsingErrors extends
QueryErrorsBase {
}
def unclosedBracketedCommentError(command: String, position: Origin):
Throwable = {
- new ParseException(Some(command), "Unclosed bracketed comment", position,
position,
- Some("_LEGACY_ERROR_TEMP_0055"))
+ new ParseException(
+ Some(command),
+ "Found an unclosed bracketed comment. Please, append */ at the end of
the comment.",
Review Comment:
I think maybe If we don't specify the message here, then `null` is returned,
so the `CliSuite.SPARK-37555: spark-sql should pass last unclosed comment to
backend` failed as below:
```
CliSuite.SPARK-37555: spark-sql should pass last unclosed comment to backend
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException:
=======================
CliSuite failure output
=======================
Spark SQL CLI command line: ../../bin/spark-sql --master local
--driver-java-options -Dderby.system.durability=test --conf
spark.ui.enabled=false --hiveconf
javax.jdo.option.ConnectionURL=jdbc:derby:;databaseName=/home/runner/work/spark/spark/target/tmp/spark-346cf558-8a95-43f1-b893-81f6a5571f3f;create=true
--hiveconf
hive.exec.scratchdir=/home/runner/work/spark/spark/target/tmp/spark-f108bccb-3f71-4854-aa70-c18ea721617c
--hiveconf conf1=conftest --hiveconf conf2=1 --hiveconf
hive.metastore.warehouse.dir=/home/runner/work/spark/spark/target/tmp/spark-86d39e14-55f9-437b-a676-7a5cabd58904
Exception: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Futures timed out after [2
minutes]
Failed to capture next expected output "Found an unclosed bracketed
comment." within 2 minutes.
2022-10-31 19:36:30.434 - stderr> Setting default log level to "WARN".
2022-10-31 19:36:30.434 - stderr> To adjust logging level use
sc.setLogLevel(newLevel). For SparkR, use setLogLevel(newLevel).
2022-10-31 19:36:41.979 - stderr> Spark master: local, Application Id:
local-1667270193279
2022-10-31 19:36:43.351 - stdout> spark-sql> /* SELECT /*+ HINT() 4; */;
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr>
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr> [PARSE_SYNTAX_ERROR] Syntax error at or
near ';'(line 1, pos 26)
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr>
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr> == SQL ==
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr> /* SELECT /*+ HINT() 4; */;
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr> --------------------------^^^
2022-10-31 19:36:44.119 - stderr>
2022-10-31 19:36:44.141 - stdout> spark-sql> /* SELECT /*+ HINT() 4; */
SELECT 1;
2022-10-31 19:36:48.341 - stdout> 1
2022-10-31 19:36:48.341 - stderr> Time taken: 4.196 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
2022-10-31 19:36:48.352 - stdout> spark-sql> /* Here is a unclosed bracketed
comment SELECT 1;
2022-10-31 19:36:48.361 - stderr>
2022-10-31 19:36:48.361 - stderr> null(line 1, pos 0)
```
I think maybe we might need to introduce new `SparkException` can cover the
existing `ParseException` such as `SparkParseException` ??
So, can we keep it as is for now, and remove the duplicated message when
`SparkParseException` is introduced ??
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
