HeartSaVioR commented on code in PR #40561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40561#discussion_r1159292444
##########
python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py:
##########
@@ -3928,6 +3928,71 @@ def dropDuplicates(self, subset: Optional[List[str]] =
None) -> "DataFrame":
jdf = self._jdf.dropDuplicates(self._jseq(subset))
return DataFrame(jdf, self.sparkSession)
+ def dropDuplicatesWithinWatermark(self, subset: Optional[List[str]] =
None) -> "DataFrame":
+ """Return a new :class:`DataFrame` with duplicate rows removed,
+ optionally only considering certain columns, within watermark.
+
+ For a static batch :class:`DataFrame`, it just drops duplicate rows.
For a streaming
+ :class:`DataFrame`, this will keep all data across triggers as
intermediate state to drop
+ duplicated rows. The state will be kept to guarantee the semantic,
"Events are deduplicated
+ as long as the time distance of earliest and latest events are smaller
than the delay
+ threshold of watermark." The watermark for the input
:class:`DataFrame` must be set via
+ :func:`withWatermark`. Users are encouraged to set the delay threshold
of watermark longer
Review Comment:
batch DataFrame does not require watermark, and we actually remove
withWatermark if the query is batch one. If we require batch query to provide
watermark, that will be very odd because we ignore the delay threshold in any
way.
So I think there are two choices, do not support batch query since it's
confusing vs just do the same with existing API for batch case.
cc. @rangadi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
