HyukjinKwon commented on PR #41986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41986#issuecomment-1635061532

   In that case, let's probably just revert 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41980 out. That feature itself is 
experimental so we don't necessarily have to support it in Spark Connect.
   
   Another way is just try to cache specifically in `sql` with kwargs. If that 
can be easily done, we could go ahead


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to