Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r30963426
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ExternalSorter.scala ---
@@ -306,14 +297,10 @@ private[spark] class ExternalSorter[K, V, C](
var success = false
try {
- val it = collection.destructiveSortedIterator(partitionKeyComparator)
+ val it =
collection.destructiveSortedWritablePartitionedIterator(comparator)
while (it.hasNext) {
- val elem = it.next()
- val partitionId = elem._1._1
- val key = elem._1._2
- val value = elem._2
- writer.write(key)
- writer.write(value)
+ val partitionId = it.nextPartition()
+ it.writeNext(writer)
elementsPerPartition(partitionId) += 1
objectsWritten += 1
--- End diff --
I suspect that this patch has rendered `spark.shuffle.spill.batchSize`
useless. It looks like we don't have any tests that are capable of detecting
whether this setting actually takes effect or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
